Formaldehyde WP6930S vs uRAD A3

Formaldehyde CH2O is a very dangerous chemical-gas that can be easily found inside a house because it off-gases from paints, carpets, furniture, etc… In this article I am going to find out how well a cheap, handheld air quality monitor WP6930S compares to a more professional solution such as the uRAD A3.

It wasn’t an easy task because the WP6930S doesn’t permit you to transfer the log file to the computer and finally I had to convert the measurements I took from the A3 because it measures in ppb and the WP6930S in mg/m3. It also took time to collect data because there wasn’t enough pollutant to measure throughout the days.

The Formaldehyde has a Molar mass of 30.031g/mol which allowed me to convert correctly all the values from ppb to mg/m3.

The A3 was already pre-calibrated but the WP6930S wasn’t so when the A3 had zero readings the WP6930S was able to detect something falsely. Remember the latter allows to adjust with a slider the measurements to match other devices by % percentage or ± value.

Screen Shot 2018-07-08 at 12.32.24.png

All the measurements were taken randomly during a whole week. The final value of R2, the coefficient of determination, is 0.6639. I think If I had calibrated the WP6930S I would have achieved a better R2 result. Just because this device had these results it doesn’t mean all the WP6930S will have the same ones, remember they don’t come pre-calibrated but they can be calibrated later by the user if they have the tools to compare the measurements.


Discover more from See The Air

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a comment