[…] of us, and no one is safe from the impurities in the air. The illustration, originally published in See the Air air quality blog, shows just how deep different sized particles can travel in our […]
[…] kaikki samaa ilmaa, eikä kenenkään elimistö ole turvassa epäpuhtauksilta. Oheisesta See the Air -ilmanlaatublogissa julkaistusta kuvasta näet, miten pitkälle eri kokoiset hiukkaset voivat kulkeutua […]
This is a great graphic but it seems to indicate that particles that are 2.5 and 1.0 don’t get into the bloodstream – that the particles have to be as small as 0.1 before they get beyond the lungs? (And does this mean 0.2 and bigger don’t create inflammation?) I am curious to learn what research is this based on as this graphic seems to understate the impacts I have come to understand are caused by particles up to 2.5 in size in size and the extent it travels into our circulatory system. Just wanting to ensure I understand this fully as I provide a lot of public education on PM2.5 (in terms of wood smoke mostly). Thanks!
Excellent information through picture, quick to understand
Reading paragraphs now is least preferred. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] of us, and no one is safe from the impurities in the air. The illustration, originally published in See the Air air quality blog, shows just how deep different sized particles can travel in our […]
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] kaikki samaa ilmaa, eikä kenenkään elimistö ole turvassa epäpuhtauksilta. Oheisesta See the Air -ilmanlaatublogissa julkaistusta kuvasta näet, miten pitkälle eri kokoiset hiukkaset voivat kulkeutua […]
LikeLike
[…] I shared an illustration that demonstrates, based on scientific research, how deep pollution particles can go into the […]
LikeLike
This is a great graphic but it seems to indicate that particles that are 2.5 and 1.0 don’t get into the bloodstream – that the particles have to be as small as 0.1 before they get beyond the lungs? (And does this mean 0.2 and bigger don’t create inflammation?) I am curious to learn what research is this based on as this graphic seems to understate the impacts I have come to understand are caused by particles up to 2.5 in size in size and the extent it travels into our circulatory system. Just wanting to ensure I understand this fully as I provide a lot of public education on PM2.5 (in terms of wood smoke mostly). Thanks!
LikeLike